Coming soon
Launching Soon

Not a generic AI rewrite.
A real-world credibility audit for your profile.

See how your profile actually reads to recruiters, hiring managers, and decision-makers — where it communicates authority and where it loses credibility. Executive Signal applies a human-informed evaluation framework, delivered consistently through AI.

View Sample Audit Get Early Access

The analysis draws on how experienced reviewers read profiles. AI makes the framework consistent and fast.

✓No LinkedIn login required
✓Data processed and discarded
✓One-time payment
✓Scored against recruiter criteria
✓Results in under a minute

Launching in

-- Days
·
-- Hours
·
-- Mins
·
-- Secs

Get early access

Be first in line. Your launch invite, nothing else.

✓  You're on the list — we'll be in touch.
Interactive Sample Audit

See exactly what your audit reveals

Synthetic sample — not a real profile. Select a role to see how the analysis adapts to different seniority levels.

Sample: Chief Technology Officer  ·  Top issue: Generic title and no quantified scope — reads as Director-level, not C-suite
Before
44 /100
After Rewrite
91 /100
Recruiter Verdict
HOLD → SHORTLIST
Shortlist Probability
41 % now
78 % rewrite
Current Headline
Technology executive driving cloud platforms, product transformation, and enterprise scale delivery
Recruiter Flags
No quantified scope — team size or P&L absent
Generic verb 'driving' signals low confidence
No domain specialisation anchor
Optimized Headline
Chief Technology Officer | P&L Ownership Across $180M Portfolio | Enterprise Cloud & AI Transformation | 3 Platform Launches
What Changed
✓P&L ownership quantified with portfolio value
✓Domain anchored: cloud, AI transformation, platform
✓Level reads clearly as C-suite — not Director
✓Delivery evidence added: 3 platform launches
Estimated shortlist probability impact: +37% from headline optimisation alone.
Current About
Leader with experience across platform modernization, cross-functional execution, and technology strategy. Focused on building scalable digital products, improving operating efficiency, and aligning engineering with business outcomes.
Positioning Gaps
Opening line reads as mid-manager, not executive
Vague scope: no team size, no revenue or budget scale
Outcomes listed without evidence or proof
Optimized Opening Hook
I lead technology strategy and platform transformation for organizations operating at enterprise scale — with P&L accountability across $180M in infrastructure and digital product investment.
Signal Improvements
✓C-suite authority established in first sentence
✓Scope anchored with $180M P&L reference
✓Domain authority clear: enterprise tech strategy
Level Estimate
Sr. Director
Shortlist Probability
41%
Recruiter Verdict
HOLD
Recruiter Signal Breakdown
Leadership Scope 58/100
Evidence Density 35/100
Domain Specificity 62/100
Narrative Clarity 70/100
Hesitation Reasons
No P&L signal Generalist positioning Missing scope quantification
Join the Waitlist →

Free to start · No login required · Full Credibility Audit $17 · Rewrite + Positioning Pack $37

Output

What you actually get

01
Executive signal score

A 0–100 score across the dimensions experienced recruiters actually evaluate — not a readability grade or keyword count.

02
Strengths and risks

Specific observations about what your profile communicates well and where it leaks credibility, ranked by hiring impact.

03
Recruiter-style interpretation

How a senior recruiter is likely to read your profile on a first pass: the verdict, the hesitation, the question marks.

04
Rewrite direction

Concrete guidance on what to change and why — tied to each specific observation, not generic tips.

05
Before and after examples

Rewritten versions of your headline, About section, and key bullets — showing the difference between current copy and stronger positioning.

06
Reasoning behind the feedback

Each observation explains why it matters in a hiring context — so you understand the judgment, not just the verdict.